 
          
            Ted Huck, MATCOR Inc., USA,
          
        
        
          highlights the importance of close interval potential surveys as a
        
        
          means of ensuring pipeline cathodic protection systems are operating to specified standards.
        
        
          
            P
          
        
        
          erhaps you have seen a safety vest-wearing
        
        
          survey crew walking down a pipeline right-of-way
        
        
          (ROW) – a lead person walking in front with a
        
        
          pipe locator, and a second person following with
        
        
          a pair of poles and a backpack containing a spool that is
        
        
          trailing a long thin copper wire – and wondered what they
        
        
          were doing. Well, they are enjoying a nice walk along the
        
        
          pipeline ROW; collecting valuable information that is used
        
        
          to ensure the integrity of the pipeline they are walking.
        
        
          This article is a primer on close interval potential
        
        
          surveys (CIPS). For those in the US, the ‘P’ is dropped and
        
        
          is referred to as CIS. Either way, this survey methodology
        
        
          is an invaluable assessment tool that is frequently
        
        
          mandated by pipeline regulatory authorities. This article
        
        
          describes the process of collecting the information
        
        
          and how that information is used as a tool to ensure a
        
        
          pipeline’s integrity.
        
        
          Any discussion of CIPS surveys should start with a
        
        
          basic understanding of what pipeline integrity means.
        
        
          Pipeline integrity represents the efforts by the pipeline
        
        
          owner to maintain their pipeline assets, and to ensure
        
        
          that the public is protected from the very serious
        
        
          consequences of pipeline failures. One of the primary
        
        
          threats to metallic pipelines is corrosion, indeed the
        
        
          United States’ Department of Transportation’s ‘Pipeline
        
        
          Incident 20 Year Trends’ reports corrosion as the second
        
        
          leading cause of all reported incidents behind material/
        
        
          weld/equipment failures, and ahead of mechanical
        
        
          damage from third parties (call before you dig). So, any
        
        
          discussion of assuring pipeline integrity has to address
        
        
          corrosion as a significant threat.
        
        
          Current best practices to prevent metallic pipeline
        
        
          corrosion include a combination of coatings and cathodic
        
        
          protection (CP). Coatings provide the primary defence
        
        
          against corrosion by isolating the pipeline from the
        
        
          environment while CP provides a secondary level of
        
        
          corrosion prevention through the application of direct
        
        
          current (DC) current along the length of the pipeline.
        
        
          This CP current is intended to flow through the earth
        
        
          seeking out exposed metal defects, also known as voids
        
        
          or holidays, in the pipeline coating along the length of
        
        
          the pipeline. As current flows onto the exposed metal,
        
        
          the electrical potential of the metal shifts, becoming
        
        
          more negative as a result of the current application. This
        
        
          33